简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:US proprietary trading sector faces setback. MetaQuotes revokes licenses, forcing firms to halt new registrations. Uncertain future looms. Belgian FSMA warns traders of risks. Traders face challenges in costly training. Some never pass, firms profit. FSMA notes use of demo accounts for commissions, terms unclear. FSMA cautions against trading, urges scrutiny of associated ecosystems. Proprietary firms not authorized for financial services. Heed FSMA warning for safer trading.
A significant setback has just occurred for the US proprietary trading sector. A major participant in the trading platform industry, MetaQuotes, created a stir last month when it revoked licenses from many proprietary trading companies. Affected organizations are struggling to come up with other solutions in the wake of this abrupt action, which has forced them to pause new customer registrations while they look for workable alternatives. Even though some companies have switched trading platforms, the industry's future is uncertain.
The Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority's (FSMA) website issues a warning. The FSMA has warned traders to be wary of proprietary trading companies. These businesses are experts at luring people into trading, sometimes focusing specifically on intricate financial products like Forex and Contracts for Difference (CFDs). Regulatory agencies like the FSMA have taken notice of this precise emphasis.
A trader's path to success is not easy, as the Financial Services and Market Association (FSMA) claims. These businesses need costly, time-consuming, and a lot of training. It is a requirement for traders to take these courses and pay the associated fees. Nevertheless, despite their best efforts, some dealers may not be able to get past these barriers, leaving them empty-handed. Regrettably, these companies continue to profit from the encounter.
Furthermore, the Financial Services and Market Association (FSMA) has drawn attention to situations where certified traders choose to forgo live trading using the company's demo accounts. Traders may only be eligible for commissions after demonstrating profitability in these virtual settings. But since proprietary trading organizations' terms are so ambiguous, it's sometimes impossible for customers to determine how much they may potentially earn in commissions.
Alongside this trend—which has corresponded with an increase in consumer inquiries—the FSMA has also seen the increased visibility of proprietary trading company marketing across different social media platforms. The fact that some of these businesses even charge for courses designed to help people pass the necessary exams raises concerns about the industry's accessibility and openness.
The FSMA has strongly cautioned against proprietary trading in light of these increased risks. It has also advised consumers to exercise caution while examining associated ecosystems, such as training programs and trading platforms. The allure of the game elements included in these transactions poses a risk as it may push clients to behave hastily and irresponsibly.
The Financial Services and Market Authority (FSMA) has stressed that proprietary trading firms cannot offer financial services. The FSMA stresses that clients must research these firms before doing business with them.
Therefore, the warning from the FSMA serves as a clear reminder of the possible risks associated with the world of proprietary trading. Traders may traverse this complicated terrain with more assurance and awareness by following this advice to the letter and being watchful.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Let's welcome the arrival of the new year. Embrace the unknown, the best is yet to come. In 2025,WikiFX will continuously promote the healthy development of the industry
HYCM is an online broker offering a wide variety of market instruments. WikiFX reviewed HYCM a few years ago. However, we wonder if this broker is still reliable in 2024 and the coming 2025. WikiFX has made a comprehension review of this broker to help you better understand the truth.
The forex market in the Philippines has seen significant growth over the past few years, with a wide range of international and local brokers offering their services to Filipino traders.
As 2024 draws to a close, the financial landscape remains fraught with deceptive practices and fraudulent brokers. WikiFX, a trusted broker regulatory query platform, has compiled a list of the 10 blacklisted brokers for December. These entities have earned their spot due to violations such as being unregulated, engaging in scamming activities, or forbidding client withdrawals. Here's a closer look at the brokers to avoid at all costs.