简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract: The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has canceled the Australian credit license of Accumulus Capital Pty Ltd (Accumulus).
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has canceled the Australian credit license of Accumulus Capital Pty Ltd (Accumulus). The decision, effective from 4 July 2024, was made due to Accumulus' failure to pay the ASIC Industry Funding Levies and associated late payment penalties within the stipulated timeframe. Additionally, Accumulus had not engaged in any credit activities since the license was granted.
Reasons for Cancellation
ASIC cited two primary reasons for the cancellation:
Non-payment of Levies and Penalties: Accumulus failed to pay the required Industry Funding Levies and the associated late payment penalties within 12 months of the due date. This non-compliance triggered the enforcement action under paragraph 54(1)(d) of the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009.
Inactivity in Credit Activities: Since the license was granted, Accumulus had not engaged in any credit activities. Under subsection 54(1A) of the Act, ASIC holds the authority to cancel a license if the licensee fails to engage in credit activities authorized by the license within six months of issuance.
Background
Accumulus held the Australian credit license number 300311 since 24 December 2014. The license allowed Accumulus to engage in specific credit activities regulated by ASIC. However, the company's inactivity in these areas and its failure to meet financial obligations led to the cancellation of its license.
Next Steps for Accumulus
Accumulus has the option to apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) for a review of ASICs decision. This process allows the company to present its case and potentially have the decision reconsidered.
Implications of the Decision
The cancellation of Accumulus' license serves as a reminder to all financial service providers of the importance of compliance with regulatory requirements. ASICs enforcement actions underscore its commitment to maintaining the integrity of the financial system and ensuring that licensed entities adhere to their obligations.
Conclusion
The cancellation of Accumulus Capital Pty Ltd's Australian credit license highlights the critical importance of regulatory compliance in the financial sector. Companies must ensure timely payment of levies and engage actively in their licensed activities to maintain their operational licenses. ASIC's decision reflects its rigorous oversight and dedication to upholding the standards of the financial services industry.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Webull Financial, alongside Lightspeed Financial Services Group and Paulson Investment Company, LLC, has agreed to pay a collective fine of $275,000 following an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The penalty was issued due to the firms’ failure to include essential information in suspicious activity reports (SARs) over a four-year period.
Barclays has reached a settlement with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), agreeing to pay a £40 million fine for failing to adequately disclose arrangements with Qatari investors during its critical fundraising efforts amidst the 2008 financial crisis.
In the midst of rapid advancements and evolving landscapes in financial technology, financial regulation, and ensuring financial security, WikiGlobal stands at the forefront, closely tracking these transformative trends. As we embark on our series of exclusive interviews focusing on these pivotal areas, we are delighted to have had an in-depth conversation with.
An individual trader has come forward with allegations of an unfavourable experience while using the services of the broker TradeEU.global.