简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:By Philip Blenkinsop BRUSSELS (Reuters) – The United States has placed the highest priority on addressing European Union fears that the U.S. green subsidies law will lure clean tech businesses to United States at Europes expense, U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai said on Tuesday.
EU concerns on green subsidy law are top U.S. priority - U.S. trade chief
By Philip Blenkinsop
BRUSSELS (Reuters) – The United States has placed the highest priority on addressing European Union fears that the U.S. green subsidies law will lure clean tech businesses to United States at Europes expense, U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai said on Tuesday.
The European Union has expressed serious concerns about the $369 billion of investment to tackle climate change in the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, which entered force this year.
Much of the investment, in the form of subsidies, applies only to local content.
The transatlantic trade partners established a task force in October to address such issues.
Tai told a briefing of reporters ahead of a meeting with EU counterpart Valdis Dombrovskis that the task force was working intensively. She said the issues were complicated and important – both for U.S.-EU relations and to address the climate crisis.
“In terms of the task force‘s work what I would say is, it’s ongoing, it really has the highest priority placed on it from President Biden himself,” Tai said.
The United States had become increasingly aware that crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical tensions had exposed vulnerability of supply chains and that having more of the chain in partner countries, “friend-shoring”, increased resilience.
The United States, Tai said, was not seeking to create its own fully domestic supply chain and wanted to create complementary trading policies with allies.
The transatlantic partners also face a deadline of October to agree on a trading regime to address overcapacity in the global steel sector and create incentives for low-carbon production of steel and aluminium.
In October 2021, the United States suspended for two years steel and aluminium tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump when he was in office.
Asked if the tariffs could be re-imposed, Tai said “theres always that chance”, adding the possibility had created a real incentive to work hard. The challenge, she said, was to figure out how to find a solution that fit two different systems.
“So, it‘s January 2023,” she said. “This is the period when we’re getting down to brass tacks.”
(Reporting by Philip Blenkinsop)
EUR/USD Ready to Extend Rally after German ZEW Data Moves into Positive TerritoryUK Average Earnings Deliver a Bank of England HeadacheGBP/JPY Forecast – British Pound Bounces During Yen WeaknessGBP to USD Forecasts: Bulls Target a Return To $1.23 on Wage GrowthAUD/USD and NZD/USD Fundamental Daily Forecast – Steady-to-Better Following China GDP BeatCrypto Market Daily Highlights – ETH Extends Winning Streak to NineLoadingLoadingLoading
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.