简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:By Leah Douglas (Reuters) – Top U.S. meatpacking companies drafted the executive order issued by President Donald Trump in 2020 to keep meat plants running and convinced his administration to encourage workers to stay on the job at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to
div classBodysc17zpet90 cdBBJodivpBy Leah Douglasp
pReuters – Top U.S. meatpacking companies drafted the executive order issued by President Donald Trump in 2020 to keep meat plants running and convinced his administration to encourage workers to stay on the job at the height of the COVID19 pandemic, according to a report released on Thursday by a U.S. House panel.pdivdivdiv classBodysc17zpet90 cdBBJodiv
pThe report by the House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis details the meat industry‘s influence on Trump’s White House as it tried to keep production rolling even as employees fell ill. More than 59,000 meatpacking workers at plants owned by the nations top five meatpackers contracted COVID19 in the first year of the pandemic and at least 269 died, according to the first report by the panel released in October. p
p“The shameful conduct of corporate executives pursuing profit at any cost during a crisis and government officials eager to do their bidding regardless of resulting harm to the public must never be repeated,” said committee chair Representative James Clyburn.p
pThe North American Meat Institute, the leading meat industry trade group, said the report “distorts the truth” and “uses 2020 hindsight and cherry picks data to support a narrative that is completely unrepresentative of the early days of an unprecedented national emergency.”p
pThe report – based on thousands of documents and interviews with workers, union officials and experts – found that in April 2020, meatpacking companies led by Tyson Foods and Smithfield Foods drafted an executive order invoking the Defense Production Act DPA to keep meat plants open.p
pThe DPA, which was enacted in 1950, gives the president emergency powers to control the domestic economy.p
pThe companies sent the draft to Department of Agriculture USDA officials and corresponded extensively with the White House, USDA, and other administration officials before the order was finalized and signed on April 28, the report found.p
pIndustry executives argued at the time that domestic meat supply was threatened by worker absenteeism.p
pThose concerns were “baseless,” the House report said. USDA data showed meatpackers had 622 million pounds of frozen pork in March 2020 and that top meatpackers pork exports grew as much as 370 in the first year of the pandemic.p
pTyson and Smithfield did not immediately respond to a request for comment.p
pIn April 2020, meat industry executives also lobbied USDA to encourage workers to report to plants as absenteeism rose, resulting in a public statement to that effect from former Vice President Mike Pence, the report found.p
pThe industry worked closely with political appointee Mindy Brashears, the USDA under secretary of food safety, and corresponded with her via her personal email and cell phone, a potential violation of the Federal Records Act, the report found.p
pThe former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Robert Redfield, also told the House committee that he added softening language, like “if feasible,” to CDC guidance for managing COVID19 spread in meat plants because he was “persuaded by industry concerns” about the potential impact of the guidance. p
p
pp Reporting by Leah Douglas Editing by Leslie Adlerp
divdivdiv classBodysc17zpet90 cdBBJodivdivdiv
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.