简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A pact between South Africa‘s government, labor unions and business to cut the debt of the stricken national power utility won’t include a pledge to use the pensions of state workers as had been initially proposed.
LISTEN TO ARTICLE
1:34
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Share
Tweet
Post
Photographer: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg
Photographer: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg
Sign up to our Next Africa newsletter and follow Bloomberg Africa on Twitter
A pact between South Africa‘s government, labor unions and business to cut the debt of the stricken national power utility won’t include a pledge to use the pensions of state workers as had been initially proposed.
An agreement due to be signed at the next meeting of the President‘s Working Council has no firm undertaking to use the funds of the 2.1 trillion rand ($120 billion) Public Investment Corp., which manages state workers’ retirement money, or private pensions, said Cas Coovadia, the chief executive officer of lobby group Business Unity South Africa. Coovadia spoke in an online briefing with Bloomberg.
The Congress of South African Trade Unions proposed in December that funds from the PIC and the Development Bank of Southern Africa, a state lender, be used to cut Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd.s debt to about 200 billion rand. The utility currently has a debt burden of about 480 billion rand.
“We just said all possible public and private financial support for Eskom and to reduce its debt must be mobilized,” said Matthew Parks, parliamentary coordinator of Cosatu, which is a member of the countrys ruling coalition. “We kept it high level.”
A date for the meeting where the accord will be signed hasnt been set. It was due to take place on Aug. 3 but was delayed.
Cosatu‘s initial proposal raised concerns that pension funds could be forced to invest in Eskom through the use of so-called prescribed assets. Business leaders, including Coovadia, have said while private investors are willing to invest in state companies and infrastructure, they don’t want to be compelled or directed to, and must earn an acceptable return on investment.
{21}
— With assistance by Prinesha Naidoo, Monique Vanek, Gordon Bell, and John McCorry
{21}
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.