简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Image copyrightEPA The government has rejected claims it is unwilling to negotiate with the EU and w
Image copyrightEPA
The government has rejected claims it is unwilling to negotiate with the EU and wants talks to fail to allow a no-deal Brexit.
It comes after the EU said UK demands to remove the Irish backstop from Theresa May's deal were unacceptable.
EU negotiators told European diplomats there was currently no basis for “meaningful discussions” and talks were back where they were three years ago.
Downing Street said the EU needed to “change its stance”.
The withdrawal agreement negotiated by Mrs May has been rejected three times by MPs.
Many opponents cite concerns over the backstop - an insurance policy to prevent a hard border returning on the island of Ireland - which if implemented, would see Northern Ireland staying aligned to some rules of the EU single market.
It would also involve a temporary single customs territory, effectively keeping the whole of the UK in the EU customs union. These arrangements would apply unless and until both the EU and UK agreed they were no longer necessary.
Media playback is unsupported on your device
Media captionConfused by Brexit jargon? Reality Check unpacks the basics.
A No 10 spokesperson said: The prime minister wants to meet EU leaders and negotiate a new deal - one that abolishes the anti-democratic backstop.
“We will throw ourselves into the negotiations with the greatest energy and the spirit of friendship and we hope the EU will rethink its current refusal to make any changes to the withdrawal agreement.”
New Prime Minister Boris Johnson has pledged to leave the EU by the deadline of 31 October, with or without a deal.
No-deal Brexit: What you need to know
Extra £2.1bn for no-deal Brexit planning
10 ways no-deal Brexit could affect you
Is it too late to hold an election before Brexit?
BBC Brussels reporter Adam Fleming said the meeting on Sunday between the officials and diplomats was a debrief from discussions last week between the EU, UK Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay and Mr Johnson's European envoy, David Frost.
A senior EU diplomat told the meeting a no-deal Brexit appeared to be the UK government's “central scenario”, according to the Daily Telegraph and the Guardian.
“It was clear UK does not have another plan. No intention to negotiate, which would require a plan,” the diplomat is reported to have said.
Mr Frost reiterated the prime minister's stance that the backstop element of Mrs May's plan must be abolished.
He also stressed that Mr Johnson's new ministers were not bound by commitments made by the previous government.
'Continued dialogue'
Further talks between the two sides have not been ruled out, and Adam Fleming said the G7 summit in France at the end of August could be the moment of truth - the point at which a no-deal Brexit becomes inevitable.
Meanwhile, Mr Johnson is due to meet his first foreign leader since entering Downing Street when Estonian Prime Minister Juri Ratas arrives for talks.
The country's Foreign Minister, Urmas Reinsalu, said while the “reality” was that the withdrawal agreement - including the backstop - had been jointly agreed by EU member states, there was still a need for continued dialogue in the coming weeks to avoid a no-deal Brexit.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme alternatives to the backstop could be discussed after the ratification of the withdrawal deal.
No reason to get back round the table
The EU is not optimistic about any agreement with the UK.
The message they are getting from Boris Johnson's team is that the UK is not going to sign another deal unless it involves getting rid of the backstop.
But the EU has been clear time and time again that it isn't going to do that - the backstop is an integral part of any withdrawal agreement and it has to stay.
So the conclusion of officials is there is no reason to get back round the table at the moment, for the simple reason that they don't think they can meet the conditions Boris Johnson has set.
There are a couple of months to try to eke something out from one of the sides - to see if somebody blinks and there is some room for negotiation either in Brussels or in London.
But at the moment, many people think the direction of travel is heading towards a no-deal Brexit.
The meeting follows an interview with Health Secretary Matt Hancock, who said he believed Parliament could no longer block the UK from leaving the EU without a deal.
In a no-deal scenario, the UK would immediately leave the EU with no agreement about the “divorce” process, and would exit overnight from the single market and customs union.
Opponents say a no-deal exit would damage the economy and lead to border posts between Northern Ireland and the Republic. Other politicians argue any disruption could be quickly overcome.
Prominent pro-EU Conservative Dominic Grieve said there were still a number of options available to MPs to block a no deal - including bringing down the government with a vote of no confidence.
Image copyrightEPAImage caption
The foreign secretary is visiting Canada, the US and Mexico this week
Meanwhile, Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab will begin a tour of North America on Tuesday as part of a bid to “fire up” the UK's trade relationships with countries outside the EU.
Mr Raab said the foreign ministers he saw at a meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Thailand last week expressed a “consistent warmth” for the UK and a “desire to work more closely with us”.
However, the former US treasury secretary, Larry Summers, said the UK was “delusional” if it believed it could secure a post-Brexit trade deal with Washington.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: “Britain has no leverage, Britain is desperate... it needs an agreement very soon. When you have a desperate partner, that's when you strike the hardest bargain.”
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.