简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:"Without 1bn [£1 billion], at the very least, from Q[atar] we are basically dead," an internal Barclays email said, according to prosecutors.
Prosecutors in court on Thursday accused Barclays executives of using secret agreements in 2008 to pay Qatari investors fees that were more than double the rate other investors paid.The court saw evidence that one executive had speculated that without the agreement, the bank would have been "dead."The prosecution alleges that official prospectuses for capital raising during the financial crisis contained "false representations" signed off by key Barclays executives.The defendants, including the bank's former CEO John Varley and the coworkers Roger Jenkins, Thomas Kalaris, and Richard Boath, have all pleaded not guilty to all charges.Barclays would have been "dead" without Qatari funding that is at the center of a trial over financial-crisis-era allegations involving former Barclays executives in London, Southwark Crown Court heard Thursday.The court heard details of the negotiations between Barclays executives and Qatari investors. The bank would have been in a difficult position without Qatar's investment. Richard Boath, then the European head of Barclays' financial institutions group, said the bank would be "dead without it" in late May 2008.Qatar had demanded higher fees to invest in the struggling bank. Barclays eventually paid the equivalent of 3.25% via separate agreements — more than double what other investors received. The existence of the extra fees was allegedly not disclosed.Email correspondence indicated that executives were aware of likely "pressure on discount and fee" for the potential investment. "Without 1bn [£1 billion], at the very least, from Q[atar] we are basically dead" Boath said to his line manager, John Winter, in an email on May 28, 2008.The Qatari tactics were also discussed by some of the executives. A message from former Barclays CEO John Varley to the bank's then-chairman, Marcus Agius, on May 25, 2008, said the Qataris were "playing hardball."This was followed by an email sent by Tom Kalaris to Varley on May 28, which added that the Qataris were playing "frankly a little harder ball than either Roger or I expected.""They've got us by the balls because the price is so low," said Robert Morrice, the chief executive of Barclays Asia, on June 3, 2008, in a call to Richard Boath.The Qatari companies in question, Qatar Investment Authority and Qatar Holdings, invested £6 billion in Barclays during capital-raising activities in 2008.Barclays paid £322 million in additional fees to the Qataris, according to Ed Brown, a prosecutor for the UK Serious Fraud Office. These fees came in the form of two separate "advisory services agreements," of £42 million and £280 million.In a conversation regarding a draft subscription agreement, Kalaris said "None of us wants to go to jail here," to which Boath responded "it ain't worth it and apparently the food sucks." Kalaris then added: "No the food sucks and the sex is worse."The trial at Southwark Crown Court is the first UK jury trial related to misconduct allegations from the financial crisis. The crisis threatened to collapse the global banking system, and several banks actually went under, including Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, and Northern Rock.Other UK lenders were forced to take funding bailouts from the government to meet their capital ratios — the metric on which a bank's stability is judged. But former Barclays executives' activity in raising capital privately from Qatari investors was later investigated for alleged fraud.The trial is ongoing.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
The British banking giant took a $2.6 billion impairment charge to reflect the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.
"My sense is that investors remain disoriented about where they actually are in the cycle," says John Hussman.
The US deficit will also soar, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said, with the total quadrupling in 2020 on coronavirus aid spending.
"There's absolutely no assurance that an oversold market will not become decidedly more oversold," says John Hussman.