简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Britain's government will from July 1 permanently take over the running of Birmingham Prison from private operator G4S after inmate violence made the prison unmanageable. The government took control from G4S, the world
EDINBURGH (Reuters) - Britain's government will from July 1 permanently take over the running of Birmingham Prison from private operator G4S after inmate violence made the prison unmanageable.
The government took control from G4S, the world's largest security company, last summer. The central England prison for 1,200 inmates, built in the 19th century, was deemed then by the chief inspector of prisons Peter Clarke to be operating in “squalid” conditions.
The transfer on a permanent basis is in the best interests of the company and its staff, G4S prison services manager Jerry Petherick said.
“Birmingham is an inner-city remand prison which faces exceptional challenges including high levels of prisoner violence towards staff and fellow prisoners,” Petherick said in a statement.
The crisis is the latest challenge in Britain's outsourcing sector after the collapse of contractor Carillion increased scrutiny of the government's long practice of tendering public services to private sector operators.
G4S operates another four major British prisons.
The company said it had already made full provisions for future operating losses as a result of the contract in its 2018 accounts, without providing a figure.
In August, Clarke said Birmingham had deteriorated dramatically in the previous 18 months, with filthy conditions, staff locking themselves in offices and prisoners openly using drugs.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.