简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:By Jonathan Stempel and Blake Brittain (Reuters) – Sweetgreen Inc said on Thursday it was renaming its newest menu item, the “Chipotle Chicken Burrito Bowl,” two days after Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc sued the salad chain for trademark infringement.
By Jonathan Stempel and Blake Brittain
(Reuters) – Sweetgreen Inc said on Thursday it was renaming its newest menu item, the “Chipotle Chicken Burrito Bowl,” two days after Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc sued the salad chain for trademark infringement.
In a statement, Sweetgreen said the dish would now be called the “Chicken + Chipotle Pepper Bowl” so that it can end the lawsuit and serve customers “without distraction,” as it continues to “connect more people to real food.”
Chipotle said in a separate statement that the new name “protects our trademarks and intellectual property, and therefore, we have both agreed to resolve the pending lawsuit.”
In its complaint, Chipotle said Sweetgreen had ignored its written demand not to use “Chipotle Chicken Burrito Bowl,” saying the “copy-cat” name was very similar to its own chicken burrito bowl and could confuse customers.
The Mexican fast-casual chain proposed an alternative name such as “chicken bowl with chipotle,” where chipotle described an ingredient rather than the entire product.
Chipotle also objected to Sweetgreen ads using a font similar to its own, and a color resembling its trademarked “Adobo Red.”
Sweetgreen launched its chipotle bowl on March 30.
The Los Angeles-based company, known for salad sales to people on lunch breaks, called the bowl part of its evolution “beyond salads” and into bowls with “zero leafy greens, so dont call it a salad.”
Chipotle is headquartered in Newport Beach, California.
In afternoon trading, Sweetgreen shares were up 51 cents, or 7.4%, at $7.40. They had fallen 46 cents on Wednesday after news of the lawsuit surfaced.
The case is Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc et al v. Sweetgreen Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, No. 23-00596.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York and Blake Brittain in Washington; Editing by Sandra Maler)
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.