简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:By Jonathan Stempel (Reuters) – A U.S. judge rejected FedEx Corp‘s request to throw out or reduce a jury’s $366 million damages award to a Black former employee who said the package delivery company fired her after she complained about racial discrimination.
FedEx loses bid to undo $366 million racial bias verdict, files appeal
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) – A U.S. judge rejected FedEx Corp‘s request to throw out or reduce a jury’s $366 million damages award to a Black former employee who said the package delivery company fired her after she complained about racial discrimination.
FedEx appealed the final judgment entered on Thursday by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Hoyt in Houston in favor of the plaintiff Jennifer Harris, who spent more than 12 years at FedEx before her January 2020 termination.
Harris said she had been a “rising star” who FedEx promoted six times and made a district manager, before her white supervisor asked her in March 2019 to take a demotion.
The plaintiff said she reported discrimination three days later, prompting the supervisor to complain about her work and issue a written warning, and culminating in her firing after a “sham” investigation.
Jurors on Oct. 25 awarded Harris $1.16 million in compensatory damages and $365 million in punitive damages.
In seeking to overturn the verdict, FedEx said Harris did not substantiate her claims, and was fired because of her “unsatisfactory performance over a period of many months.”
FedEx also said punitive damages should not have exceeded the compensatory damages awarded.
The Memphis, Tennessee-based company has said it believed insurance would cover up to $75 million of any payout, subject to a $10 million retention.
FedEx appealed the verdict to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.
The company and Harris lawyer did not immediately respond on Friday to requests for comment.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.