简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Pollster Frank Luntz said that the 6% of voters that are "truly undecided" are the greatest hurdle to campaigns for 2020 hopefuls.
Republican pollster Frank Luntz told Business Insider Today that candidates in the 2020 presidential election are on track to spend $2 billion on trying to sway 1.2% of the US population.
Luntz said that the 6% of voters that are “truly undecided” are the greatest hurdle to campaigns for 2020 hopefuls.
The 6% slice that candidates will be spending big on has “never been that small,” Luntz said.
Republican pollster Frank Luntz told Business Insider Today that candidates in the 2020 presidential election are on track to spend $2 billion on trying to sway 1.2% of the US population.
Luntz said that the 6% of voters that are “truly undecided” are the greatest hurdle to campaigns for 2020 hopefuls.
“If you're that undecided now when everybody else has made up their minds, it's going to be very hard to move you,” Luntz said. “All this money and all this time and all this effort is going to be spent on 6% of the country.”
Luntz specified that the 6% included people who were “conflicted, the ones that liked aspects of the Trump presidency, but not all of it, or the ones who disliked much of what he's done,” not those who could flatly deny a candidate.
The 6% slice that candidates will be spending big on has “never been that small,” Luntz said.
“I don't think more money will be spent with more effort and more intensity on a smaller group of people than what will happen in this election,” Luntz said. “Because in the end, if you're undecided in Texas or California or New York, you don't matter. So it's 6% who are undecided in 20% of the states that could actually move.”
Read more: Conservatives say Democrats should adopt centrist policies if they want to win back Trump voters. But there's a much more effective way for them to defeat Trump.
The 2020 Election would break records for the most expensive election yet, including in trackable metrics like political ad spending by presidential hopefuls.
Media analytics groups have projected the 2020 Election would break records for the most expensive election yet, with anywhere from $6-10 billion spent on political ads, in comparison to the estimated $6.3 billion that was spent on the 2016 Election.
One group told Forbes that toss-up states would be at the center of this targeted ad spending, including Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Florida, Iowa, Maine, Nevada, and New Hampshire.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Sweden avoided a lockdown and only has some rules, and locals say trust in authorities has left people happy to socially distance with few new laws.
Anyone with basic knowledge of Keynes and Laffer could've predicted what was just confirmed by GDP: Trump's tax cuts did nothing for the US economy.
The boost in the number of employed Americans largely tracks with the nation's sluggish population growth as Americans come of age and start working.
Previously, House Democrats have subpoenaed acting OMB Director Russel Vought and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.