简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Facebook is reportedly considering testing hiding public likes on the core platform to improve user experience by lessening competitive pressure.
This is an excerpt from a story delivered exclusively to Business Insider Intelligence Digital Media Briefing subscribers.
To receive the full story plus other insights each morning, click here.
Facebook is reportedly considering testing hiding public likes on the core platform, after running such tests on Instagram, per TechCrunch.
Instagram began testing the feature in Canada in May before rolling out tests to six additional countries including Australia, Brazil, and Japan in July. If Facebook does move forward with the tests, it would likely do so very gradually — and pull back if it senses the change will harm engagement in any way.
Facebook is considering this change to improve user experience by lessening competitive pressure between users. By prioritizing likes, platforms encourage friends to compete with one another for attention. Ahead of its expanded tests in July, Instagram tweeted, “We want your friends to focus on the photos and videos you share, not how many likes they get…We're looking forward to learning more about how this change might benefit everyone's experience on Instagram.”
The feature could especially improve user experience for younger generations, as multiple studies have shown that social media use can hurt teens' mental health. For instance, while like counts may not be entirely causal, 59% of US teens say they've been bullied or harassed online, per Pew Research. By lessening the pressure users feel to compete for attention, platforms can both make themselves healthier for frequent users and boost engagement among those who may have self-protectively phased out of sharing.
This push could be read as yet another instance of the social giant modeling itself after Snapchat, as the ephemeral messaging app has always operated without likes. Last May, Snap CEO Evan Spiegel spoke to the platform's purposeful absence of likes: “Snapchat is not just a bunch of features. It really has an underlying philosophy that runs directly counter to traditional social media. And I think that's why traditional social media feels threatened. Because fundamentally if people realize that competing with their friends for likes and attention is kind of unpleasant and really not that great, then I think they're gonna look for alternatives.”
Likely as a result, some social apps are more correlated with anxiety than others. By removing likes, Facebook could “reformat” its DNA to align itself more with Snapchat's “underlying philosophy,” which places interaction far ahead of competition. It could also align with Facebook's long term plan to steer users toward more impermanent sharing where likes are a less meaningful demarcation of value.
Ultimately, removing likes could boost usage in the long run by playing into the habits of younger users, who prefer authenticity and in-the-moment sharing. Younger social media users who have grown up with apps like Snapchat and Instagram are less interested in their social profiles being permanent chronicles of their lives. For example, some teens routinely purge their Instagram accounts of all photos, tending instead to view the platform's utility as a snapshot of who they are in any given moment or period in time, rather than as a “photo album.”
Deprioritizing likes could be another way of leaning into that preference among younger users, because it frees users up to decide a post's value for themselves. Over time, particularly as young people age, permanent sharing on platforms might not only become less meaningful, but it could even be seen as a deterrent.
Interested in getting the full story? Here are three ways to get access:
Sign up for the Digital Media Briefing to get it delivered to your inbox 6x a week. >> Get Started
Subscribe to a Premium pass to Business Insider Intelligence and gain immediate access to the Digital Media Briefing, plus more than 250 other expertly researched reports. As an added bonus, you'll also gain access to all future reports and daily newsletters to ensure you stay ahead of the curve and benefit personally and professionally. >> Learn More Now
Current subscribers can read the full briefing here.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
A 47-year-old Malaysian man fell victim to an investment scam, losing RM124,000 after being misled by a fraudulent scheme promoted on social media. The scheme, advertised on Facebook, promised high returns through an application called L-Trader, which the man was led to believe could generate millions in profits.
A 60-year-old man from Johor became the latest victim of a fraudulent investment scheme, losing RM406,654 after being lured into what was advertised as a high-return opportunity on Facebook. The scheme, which promised a 10% interest return on invested capital within three months, proved to be a sophisticated scam that left the victim financially devastated.
A retiree from Pahang (Malaysia), lost RM163,300 to an online investment scam after withdrawing his Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) savings and selling his unit trust investments in pursuit of larger returns.
A 50-year-old contractor from Johor became the latest victim of an online investment scam, losing a staggering RM688,000 after being lured by an attractive scheme he discovered on Facebook. The scam, known as DFA, promised exceptionally high returns and involved an elaborate web of communication through social media and investment groups.