简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Image copyrightGetty ImagesImage caption Judy Murray raised the issue of the US Open's competition w
Image copyrightGetty ImagesImage caption
Judy Murray raised the issue of the US Open's competition wording
The website for the US Open tennis tournament has apologised for comparing the men's and women's semi-finals “unfavourably” and reworded its competition to win tickets for them.
The move followed criticism from prominent figures in the game.
The website at first explained how fans registering for a 2019 access pass could win a “grand prize” to see the 2019 men's semi-finals.
Runners-up could win tickets to the women's semi-finals.
Skip Twitter post by @JudyMurray
This looks great @usopen. Until you come to paragraph two. ?♀️? pic.twitter.com/JY4xcrUfYi
— judy murray (@JudyMurray) August 14, 2019
Report
End of Twitter post by @JudyMurray
Among those to point out the discrepancy were Judy Murray, mother and former coach of Wimbledon and US Open champion Andy Murray, and 18-times Grand Slam champion Martina Navratilova.
Ms Murray said the prize sounded “great, until you get to the second paragraph”, which read: “And if you don't win the grand prize, don't worry, there's more. You will have the chance to win 2019 women's semi-finals tickets.”
The wording on the website has been changed ahead of the tournament, which begins on 26 August, but Navratilova expressed her “disappointment” in a reply to Ms Murray, as social media users shared their views.
Skip Twitter post by @Martina
Not a surprise here , but disappointment? That would be a yes....
— Martina Navratilova (@Martina) August 14, 2019
Report
End of Twitter post by @Martina
“What a poor message to send out, women being the consolation prize,” posted another Twitter user.
While another tweet read: “Big fail @usopen. Women's sport is not second-class, the runners-up prize or in anyway inferior. Really disappointed this is your attitude. Change it, it's soooo out of date.”
In a seperate post, one Twitter user suggested other ways of describing the prize could also be problematic. “The alternative is men being the consolation prize, and that's as insulting as what they've put above. They literally can't win.”
Image copyrightUS OPEN TENNIS
In a statement the United States Tennis Association, which runs the US Open, apologised for the language it had used in its original description. While describing the prizes in the Ultimate US Open Experience, the language used inadvertently compared the men's and women's semi-finals unfavourably.
“The US Open is proud of its long tradition of gender equity and we sincerely apologise for not adequately describing the differences in the prize packages,” it said.
The US Open was the first Grand Slam tournament to offer equal prize money to men and women, in 1973. Wimbledon was the last to do so, in 2007.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.