简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Image copyrightJOHN YOUNGImage caption The 2017 re-discovery of the night parrot in South Australia
Image copyrightJOHN YOUNGImage caption
The 2017 re-discovery of the night parrot in South Australia is being disputed
An Australian conservation group has been forced to retract published research on the discovery of an endangered bird.
In 2017, ecologist John Young claimed to have found traces of the night parrot, one of the world's rarest birds.
His findings were published by the Australian Wildlife Conservancy (AWC).
However, last year the evidence was called into question by other scientists.
On Friday, AWC - one of the largest conservation organisations in Australia - said it would retract his published research, after a probe found flaws.
Mr Young denies any wrongdoing, telling the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: “I have no interest in any criticism.”
What was wrong with the evidence?
An independent investigation, commissioned by the AWC, and carried out by other scientists found major discrepancies in Mr Young's research.
The noted ecologist had been hired by the not-for-profit group in 2016, but resigned last year in the wake of the accusations.
Image copyrightAUSTRALIAN WILDLIFE CONSERVANCYImage caption Photos of a feather in a nest had been used as proof of the bird's presence
For the 2017 discovery, he had submitted a feather, found in a zebra finch nest in Kalamurina Wildlife Sanctuary in South Australia, as proof of the parrot's presence in the remote region.
However, the investigation found that photographs of the feather in the nest did not match up with the specimen later submitted to the South Australian Museum.
Supposed recordings of the parrot's calls at the sanctuary were also found to be “playback” of publicly available recordings.
As a result, the conservation group said it had to correct the public record, and retract the published research.
The bird's presence in a part of Queensland, based on photographs taken by Mr Young in 2013, is now also in dispute.
“The methods used in this work were not consistent with the AWC's usual procedures,” said chief executive Tim Allard in a statement on Friday.
He added that the organisation was also retracting other records made by Mr Young in relation to other rare bird species.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.