简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:By David Milliken LONDON (Reuters) – In their fifties and deciding there was more to life than work, Liz and Ian Woodbridge quit stressful jobs during the pandemic – part of a cohort of British early retirees now resisting a government call to return, despite rising
By David Milliken
LONDON (Reuters) – In their fifties and deciding there was more to life than work, Liz and Ian Woodbridge quit stressful jobs during the pandemic – part of a cohort of British early retirees now resisting a government call to return, despite rising living costs.
For an array of reasons, including ill health, hundreds of thousands of older workers left their jobs during and after the societal disruptions of COVID-19, contributing to a chronic labour shortage that forecasters predict will drag on Britains economic performance for years.
The relative wealth of many of the early retirees poses a challenge for finance minister Jeremy Hunt, who has said Britain needs them to leave “the golf course”. Hunt is considering policies to encourage them back in the UKs March 15 budget.
But with no mortgage to pay, and enjoying a new lifestyle in the English countryside, both Liz, a 58-year-old former tech marketing executive, and Ian, a 57-year-old ex-fund manager, have spurned consultancy offers from their old employers.
“Nothing would ever entice me to go back to any kind of work,” said Liz, who tried a temporary job invigilating exams at a local school but soon resented the intrusion into her time.
Double-digit inflation has increased their day-to-day costs, but not enough to change their minds, Ian said.
For the government, the shrinking labour force is a headache that reduces economic capacity and fans wage demands and inflation. It comes at a time when Britains growth is also held back by Brexit-related trade and investment disruption.
Britain is the only one of the worlds seven largest advanced economies to still be smaller than it was before the pandemic, and economists see a link to the smaller workforce.
Since the final quarter of 2019, Britain has lost 408,000 people aged 16 to 64 from the workforce, according to the Office of National Statistics. Of those, 313,000 were over 50.
Even with the surge in the cost of living, the number of people aged 50-64 in the labour force has risen by just 68,000 since its low point in mid-2022.
The exodus of older workers has no equivalent in other advanced economies. The employment rate for workers aged 55-64 has fallen more than in any other advanced economy, according to figures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
The Bank of England forecast last month that Britains overall labour force participation rate would remain below its pre-pandemic level for the foreseeable future.
Hunts options are limited. Although Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said at the start of the year that he wanted to use the welfare system better to get people back to work, around 90% of people aged 55 to 59 who have retired early or are out of work do not depend on state benefits, according to an Office for National Statistics survey.
“It‘s quite a hard sell,” said Tony Wilson, director of Britain’s Institute for Employment Studies. “The best part of 90% of people who say they are early retired … say that they will probably or definitely never work again.”
“GOLDEN GENERATION”
For the Woodbridges, the government should focus its limited resources on helping the young rather than pushing comfortable older people into work with tax breaks, saying their “golden generation” has already enjoyed final salary pensions, free university education and cheaper housing that the young can only dream of.
“Kids are saddled with student loans and they‘re basically picking up the tab for the 40-year party that we’ve enjoyed,” Ian said.
Business groups and researchers agree that acting on childcare would do more to unlock greater economic growth.
Wealth plays a big factor in decisions to retire early. Based on data from before the pandemic, Britains Resolution Foundation found the richest fifth of 50-59 year olds were 10 times likelier to retire early than the bottom fifth.
Britons with private pensions can withdraw assets without tax penalties from the age of 55 – a lower age than elsewhere.
This could have contributed to Britains greater fall in older workers, said Stephen Millard, deputy director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research think tank.
In the Woodbridges case, the pandemic threw up economic opportunities that accelerated their decision to retire early, Ian said, including increasing the value of their home near London, which they sold to move to a cheaper property in rural Shropshire.
But the well-off are not the only ones to leave the work force early.
Deborah Feighan, 62, retired from her job as a ward administrator for Britains National Health Service in April 2020 and lives on a modest pension along with her husband Malachy, who had to stop work due to knee problems.
Former colleagues have suggested she return to work, but she does not want to go back to her previous rigid shift pattern.
Research by the Trades Union Congress suggests that for lower-paid Britons aged 50-64, ill health is a more common reason to leave work than early retirement.
Compared with late 2019, 390,000 more people across Britains working-age population say long-term ill-health is the reason for their economic inactivity.
For 50-64 year olds specifically, there is less official data available, but in the year to the end of September 2022 there was a roughly even split between early retirement and ill health among people who had stopped work since the pandemic.
Keeping staff working
In some cases, older people who do want to work find it difficult to get hired.
Maya Bhose, 61, is looking for a position as a marketing director, preferably at a charity, but has struggled to find work for a year, and only received one job interview since September.
“You can‘t prove that the difficulty is because of your age, but that’s certainly how it feels,” she said.
Other companies say they value older workers for their experience. For Jenny Holloway, the 60-year-old chief executive of Fashion-Enter Ltd, keeping hold of such workers is a priority, especially with fewer European workers available after Brexit.
She has increased pay a bit and offered flexible job roles and shifts to make the apparel company more appealing.
A skilled stitcher can earn 20 pounds ($24) an hour, Holloway said – well above the British average – but it takes years for a new worker to reach that standard.
Yasemin Mehmet, 68, returned to Fashion-Enter last year after briefly retiring in late 2021 to care for her daughter and grandson, who were in poor health.
As she machine-sewed a wedding dress, Mehmet said money was part of the reason she returned, but that she still enjoyed creating clothes, more than half a century after starting work as a 14-year-old girl.
“I made it up. I created it. Thats always given me pleasure,” she said.
Fashion-Enter, which makes up to 25,000 garments a week for clients such as ASOS and Amazon as well as smaller runs for high-end designers, lost dozens of staff during the pandemic and afterwards, as many found they could get by on lower incomes. Some returned to home countries in eastern Europe.
“Older workers are the ones that have got the skills – we don‘t find young people with the skills that we need. So it’s very important to retain them,” Holloway said.
(Reporting by David Milliken; Editing by Frank Jack Daniel)
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.