WikiFX, as an independent third-party information service platform, is dedicated to providing users with comprehensive and objective broker regulatory information services. WikiFX does not directly engage in any forex trading activities, nor does it offer any form of trading channel recommendations or investment advice. The ratings and evaluations of brokers by WikiFX are based on publicly available objective information and take into account the regulatory policy differences of various countries and regions. Broker ratings and evaluations are the core products of WikiFX, and we firmly oppose any commercial practices that may compromise their objectivity and fairness. We welcome supervision and suggestions from users worldwide. To report any concerns, please contact us: report@wikifx.com
您当前语言与浏览器默认语言不一致,是否切换?
切换
Global Broker Regulation & Inquiry App

Australia Securities & Investment Commission

Year 1998Regulated by Government

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is an independent Australian government body that acts as Australia's corporate regulator, which was established on 1 July 1998 following recommendations from the Wallis Inquiry. ASIC's role is to enforce and regulate company and financial services laws to protect Australian consumers, investors and creditors. ASIC's authority and scope were determined by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act, 2001.

Disclose broker
Sanction Fine
Disclosure summary
  • Disclosure matching Name matching
  • Disclosure time 2023-09-22
  • Reason for punishment NAB charged periodic payment fees even though they knew it was wrongfully overcharging customers.
Disclosure details

NAB penalised $2.1 million for unconscionable conduct over account fees

MEDIA RELEASE (23-258MR) NAB penalised $2.1 million for unconscionable conduct over account fees Published 22 September 2023 The Federal Court has ordered National Australia Bank Ltd (NAB) pay a $2.1 million penalty for unconscionable conduct by continuing to charge periodic payment fees even though NAB knew it was wrongfully overcharging customers. ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said, ‘NAB continued to charge fees when it knew it lacked any entitlement to do so and omitted to tell its customers of that wrongful charging. It took NAB over two years to stop charging these incorrect fees, which was clearly unacceptable. ‘The Court concluded that the central cause of NAB’s wrongful charging was the bank’s inability to manage its own computer systems and its unwillingness to apply sufficient resources to remedy the problem in a timely manner. ‘An unconscionable conduct ruling, penalty and resulting remediation program demonstrates the consequences that come from not resolving an issue in a timely way. If systems have let customers down, we expect all financial institutions, especially our banks, to act quickly to reduce consumer harm,’ concluded Ms Court. The Court found that between January 2017 and July 2018, NAB engaged in unconscionable conduct by continuing to charge periodic payment fees when it knew it had no contractual entitlement to do so (22-304MR). NAB wrongfully charged periodic payment fees on 74,593 occasions totalling $139,845 to 2,888 personal banking customers and 513 business banking customers. Justice Derrington found NAB ‘unjustifiably advanced its self interest whilst knowing that its customers were oblivious to the wrongful charging that was taking place. It deliberately and cynically took advantage of its customers’ unawareness, and was prepared to allow the overcharging to continue whilst it searched, admittedly in good faith, but without any great diligence, for a solution. Such moral dereliction would seem to reflect an inherent sense of entitlement, possibly precipitated by a view that no real harm would come to the bank even if its conduct was detected. It is, perhaps, also a product of a corporate culture that places a low priority on the observance of the law and on respect for its customers’ legal rights.’ In imposing the penalty, Justice Derrington noted that the maximum penalty for the single contravention was applied, noting ‘the only penalty that can appropriately be imposed is $2.1 million. That is, without question, woefully insufficient in the circumstances. However, some solace can be taken in the fact that, in the time that has passed since the contravening conduct in this case occurred, the relevant provisions of the ASIC Act have been updated to permit the imposition of a substantially higher penalty.’ In addition to the $2.1 million penalty, NAB has paid approximately $9 million in remediation to affected customers who incurred incorrect periodic payment fees from 1 August 2001. Justice Derrington also ordered NAB to publish an adverse publicity notice on its website and pay ASIC’s costs. DOWNLOAD Judgment(PDF) Order(PDF) Background The penalty for unconscionable conduct in breach of the ASIC Act, for conduct that occurred after March 2019, is at least $15.65 million. Between at least 20 July 2007 and 22 February 2019, NAB’s terms and conditions stated NAB would charge $1.80 for periodic payments to other accounts within NAB and $5.30 for periodic payments to accounts at another bank. NAB’s terms also stated that customers would be entitled to exemptions from periodic payment fees for certain transactions, such as payments to NAB home loans, NAB personal loans, certain NAB savings accounts and certain NAB service packages. During this period, NAB charged some customers a periodic payment fee of: $1.80 or $5.30 when they were entitled to an exemption under NAB’s terms and conditions; or $5.30 when the correct fee was $1.80. NAB ceased charging all periodic payment fees to customers on 22 February 2019.
Annex
More regulatory disclosure

Danger

2021-01-24

Danger

2022-05-19
Warnings axia trade
Axia Investments

Danger

2021-02-22

Check whenever you want

Download App for complete information

Select Country/Region
  • Hong Kong

  • Taiwan

    tw.wikifx.com

  • United States

    us.wikifx.com

  • South Korea

    kr.wikifx.com

  • United Kingdom

    uk.wikifx.com

  • Japan

    jp.wikifx.com

  • Indonesia

    id.wikifx.com

  • Vietnam

    vn.wikifx.com

  • Australia

    au.wikifx.com

  • Singapore

    sg.wikifx.com

  • Thailand

    th.wikifx.com

  • Cyprus

    cy.wikifx.com

  • Germany

    de.wikifx.com

  • Russia

    ru.wikifx.com

  • Philippines

    ph.wikifx.com

  • New Zealand

    nz.wikifx.com

  • Ukraine

    ua.wikifx.com

  • India

    in.wikifx.com

  • France

    fr.wikifx.com

  • Spain

    es.wikifx.com

  • Portugal

    pt.wikifx.com

  • Malaysia

    my.wikifx.com

  • Nigeria

    ng.wikifx.com

  • Cambodia

    kh.wikifx.com

  • Italy

    it.wikifx.com

  • South Africa

    za.wikifx.com

  • Turkey

    tr.wikifx.com

  • Netherlands

    nl.wikifx.com

  • United Arab Emirates

    ae.wikifx.com

  • Colombia

    co.wikifx.com

  • Argentina

    ar.wikifx.com

  • Belarus

    by.wikifx.com

  • Ecuador

    ec.wikifx.com

  • Egypt

    eg.wikifx.com

  • Kazakhstan

    kz.wikifx.com

  • Morocco

    ma.wikifx.com

  • Mexico

    mx.wikifx.com

  • Peru

    pe.wikifx.com

  • Pakistan

    pk.wikifx.com

  • Tunisia

    tn.wikifx.com

  • Venezuela

    ve.wikifx.com

United States
※ The content of this website abides with local laws and regulations.
You are visiting the WikiFX website. WikiFX Internet and its mobile products are an enterprise information searching tool for global users. When using WikiFX products, users should consciously abide by the relevant laws and regulations of the country and region where they are located.
consumer hotline:006531290538
Official Email:support@wikifx.com;
Mobile Phone Number:234 706 777 7762;61 449895363
Telegram:+60 103342306
Whatsapp:+852-6613 1970;
License or other information error corrections, please send the information to:qawikifx@gmail.com
Cooperation:fxeyevip@gmail.com