简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:NEW DELHI, July 10 (Reuters) - Taiwans Foxconn (2317.TW) said on Monday it had withdrawn from a join
NEW DELHI, July 10 (Reuters) - Taiwans Foxconn (2317.TW) said on Monday it had withdrawn from a joint venture with conglomerate Vedanta (VDAN.NS), in a blow to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modis chipmaking plans.
Here is a timeline of how events have unfolded since the signing of the $19.5 billion joint venture:
* Feb. 14, 2022: Foxconn partners with Vedanta to make semiconductors in India in a bid to diversify its business. Foxconn said it will be \“a significant boost to domestic manufacturing of electronics in India\”.
* Sept. 13, 2022: Vedanta and Foxconn sign pacts to invest $19.5 billion to set up semiconductor and display production. Modis home state Gujarat is selected for the facilities.
* Sept. 14, 2022: Vedantas Anil Agarwal says the Indian metals-to-oil conglomerate does not see funding problems for the JV.
* May 19, 2023: Deputy IT minister Chandrasekhar tells Reuters the JV \“struggling\” to tie up with a technology partner.
* May 31, 2023: Reuters reports that Vedanta-Foxconn JV proceeding slowly as talks to involve STMicroelectronics (STMPA.PA) are deadlocked. Vedanta-Foxconn had got on board STMicro for licensing technology, but Indias government had made clear it wants the European chipmaker to have \“more skin in the game\”, such as a stake in the partnership, a source with direct knowledge of the matter said.
* June 30, 2023: India market regulator fines Vedanta for breaching disclosure rules by publishing a press release that made it appear it had partnered with Foxconn to make semiconductors in India, as the deal was with Vedantas holding company.
* July 10, 2023: Foxconn drops Vedanta chip JV, without specifying a reason. \“Foxconn has determined it will not move forward on the joint venture with Vedanta,\” it said, saying it had worked for more than a year on the project but the two sides had mutually decided to end the JV.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.