简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The U.K. should adopt a farming certification system to safeguard high food standards as it negotiates future trade deals, according to recommendations from a government-commissioned review.
The U.K. should adopt a farming certification system to safeguard high food standards as it negotiates future trade deals, according to recommendations from a government-commissioned review.
Ministers were urged to introduce a program to allow farmers from other countries to certify they meet British animal welfare and environmental standards. This would then result in a cut to tariffs provided they meet the benchmark, according to the National Food Strategy published Wednesday.
“Standards are not the same thing as protectionism,” said Henry Dimbleby, the reviews lead author. “Using tailored certification systems would allow us to get these deals done without compromising on our core values.”
The U.K. is looking to make trade deals as it prepares to fully leave the European Union at the end of the year and agriculture has been a particular sticking point in talks with Washington. There has been a public backlash over fears that Britain will be flooded with U.S. food produced at lower standards -- most notably chlorine-washed chicken or hormone-treated beef.
The certification system would allow Britain to reach agreements without having to surrender its high standards in the face of political pressure, according to Dimbleby, co-founder of the Leon restaurant chain. He was picked by the government to lead the study, which is billed as the first major review of British food in 75 years.
Such certification systems would not be required for trading with the EU, to which the U.K. is already closely aligned, or for deals with other countries that may carry over from the EU, he said.
“The issue of how to strike trade deals without lowering food standards needs to be addressed now, before it is too late,” Dimbleby said. “There is justifiable concern about opening up our markets to cheaper, low-standard imports which would undercut our own producers and make a nonsense of our progressive farming policies.”
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.